Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger has repealed a prior executive order that directed state and local law enforcement agencies to cooperate with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, reversing a policy put in place under former Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin.
Spanberger announced the repeal through a new executive order that rescinds Executive Order No. 47, which Youngkin signed in February 2025.
Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger Ends State Police Cooperation with ICE Hours After Taking Office pic.twitter.com/SyKSUIWkky
— NewsWire (@NewsWire_US) January 17, 2026
The earlier order required the Virginia State Police and the Department of Corrections to enter into Section 287(g) agreements with ICE, a federal program that authorizes trained local officers to assist in enforcing certain immigration laws.
“This Executive Order rescinds Executive Order 47,” Spanberger said.
Here's What They're Not Telling You About Your Retirement
MORE NEWS: Families Watch in Horror as Skydiving Plane Plummets in France Killing All 11 on Board [WATCH]
“State and local law enforcement should not be required to divert their limited resources to enforce federal civil immigration laws. It is a responsibility of federal law enforcement. Virginia state and local enforcement officers must be able to focus on their core responsibilities, investigating crime and community policing.”
As previously reported by Breitbart News, Youngkin’s executive order directed the Virginia State Police and the Department of Corrections to formalize cooperation with ICE through the 287(g) program.
That directive also instructed the Secretary of Public Safety and Homeland Security to seek certifications from local and regional jail authorities confirming full cooperation with ICE and participation in the 287(g) Virginia State Police task force.
FREE Gun Law Map: Laws Don't Pause During Social Unrest
Breitbart’s Neil Munro reported at the time that the federal 287(g) program is designed to train and authorize local police forces to link arrests made at the local level with ICE enforcement actions.
Spanberger’s order repealing Youngkin’s directive states that state and local law enforcement agencies should instead “be focused on their core responsibilities of investigating and deterring criminal activity, staffing jails, and community engagement.”
“Since 2025, Virginians have been deprived of critical public safety resources due to the directives in Executive Order No. 47 (2025) that require and encourage state and local law enforcement to divert their limited resources for use in enforcing federal civil immigration laws,” Spanberger’s order states.
The repeal follows statements Spanberger made prior to the November gubernatorial election, when she confirmed in an interview with the Virginia Mercury that she would rescind Youngkin’s order if elected.
MORE NEWS: Stephen A Smith Slams Clinton And Obama For Massive Fortunes While Americans Struggle [WATCH]
During that interview, Spanberger said that while the nation’s immigration system is flawed, she believed using state and local law enforcement to assist ICE was an inappropriate allocation of resources.
Though she acknowledged that the “immigration system is absolutely broken,” Spanberger said it was a “misuse” of local law enforcement resources to pull officers and deputies away from their regular duties to assist in immigration enforcement.
“The idea that we would take local police officers or local sheriff’s deputies in amid all the things that they have to do, like community policing or staffing our jail or investigating real crimes, so that they can go and tear families apart… that is a misuse of those resources,” Spanberger said.
Supporters of Youngkin’s now-repealed order had argued that cooperation with ICE enhances public safety by ensuring that illegal aliens encountered by law enforcement, particularly those charged or convicted of crimes, can be identified and transferred to federal custody.
Critics, including Spanberger, countered that immigration enforcement is a federal responsibility and that local agencies lack the capacity to take on additional duties without affecting core services.
The repeal places Virginia among states that limit or restrict formal cooperation between state and local law enforcement agencies and ICE, particularly with respect to civil immigration enforcement.
The decision also removes the requirement that local jail authorities certify cooperation with ICE or participate in the 287(g) task force.
Spanberger’s action marks a significant shift in Virginia’s approach to immigration enforcement and law enforcement cooperation, undoing a policy that had been in effect since early 2025 and reaffirming her stated position that state and local police should remain focused on traditional public safety roles rather than federal immigration duties.
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of RVM News. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.
Arrest her and do what ICE needs to do. If the law enforcement won’t cooperate arrest them too. This is sedition and treachery.
Spanberger speaks double talk. She said officers should be community policing, staffing our jails and investigating crimes, doesn’t she realize by holding criminals for ICE pick up that her officers would be doing their job and enabling their communities to be safer by getting these criminals off the streets and out of our country? The people of Virginia better wake up to a state that will be overrun with criminals who shouldn’t even be here and a government who loves the criminals more than them, the citizens.
Spanberger removed the requirement for state and local LEO and jail to assist federal ICE efforts or participate in 287(g) task force activity. But nowhere in this article does it say whether or not those state and local departments are prohibited from such assistance. Why the glaring omission?
So i guess that the federal laws requiring a background check for all firearm purchases should also be ignored by local law enforcement?