Former White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre testified before the House Oversight Committee on Friday, facing questions about President Joe Biden’s cognitive abilities and the ongoing controversy over the use of an autopen for official documents.
Like other former Biden officials brought before the committee, Jean-Pierre avoided answering questions from reporters as she entered and exited the closed-door session.
Reporters pressed her on whether she planned to address the autopen scandal in the book she is writing and whether pardons were connected to its use. She offered no public response.
Karine Jean-Pierre ignored questions from the press ahead of going before the House Oversight Committee. pic.twitter.com/WEWgcAKN0y
— Fred Lucas (@FredLucasWH) September 12, 2025
Trump's Sovereign Wealth Fund: What Could It Mean For Your Money?
MORE NEWS: Charlie Kirk’s Death ‘Awoke a Sleeping Giant,’ Turning Point USA Chapter Requests Explode
During nearly six hours of testimony, Jean-Pierre told investigators that she “did not see a change in Biden’s competency from 2009 to 2025,” according to a source familiar with the interview.
At the same time, she acknowledged that Biden, now 82, was “not the same speaker he was when she met him,” but she could not explain the reason for the change in his speaking ability, the source said.
This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year
MORE NEWS: Disturbing New Details Emerge After Charlotte Train Murder of a Ukrainian Refugee [WATCH]
Jean-Pierre also disclosed that she had been given specific instructions on how to handle questions about Biden’s condition while serving as press secretary.
She testified that someone — she said she did not know who — placed guidance in her briefing binder directing her to use the “cheap fakes” defense when asked about videos circulating online that showed Biden appearing confused or unsteady.
According to the source, Jean-Pierre admitted that she often received talking points from various advisers but emphasized that issues relating to Biden’s health and mental acuity were “handled exclusively at the senior level.”
A former Biden White House colleague confirmed to the New York Post that senior advisers Anita Dunn and Mike Donilon coordinated the talking points related to Biden’s condition.
House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer said after the session that he believed Jean-Pierre may have included information in her upcoming book that could be helpful to the committee’s investigation.
WATCH: KJP refuses to answer questions after giving closed-door testimony on Biden’s cognitive decline
Footage from @_CadenOlson pic.twitter.com/ugsdJnRRdF
— Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) September 12, 2025
MORE NEWS: Country Star Zach Bryan Hurls Death Threats at Gavin Adcock During Music Festival Meltdown [WATCH]
Not all of Jean-Pierre’s former colleagues were supportive of her testimony.
One former Biden aide told the New York Post, “Not a good look for the most public-facing person from the last administration, especially when she’s hawking a book.”
Another former aide was more pointed, saying, “I would like to ask her if she has a mind of her own — she just did what was on the paper? No critical thinking.”
Jean-Pierre’s testimony is the latest in a series of closed-door interviews with former Biden-Harris administration officials as lawmakers scrutinize Biden’s fitness for office and the handling of official documents bearing his signature.
The Oversight Committee continues to investigate allegations that the president’s staff relied on an autopen to issue pardons and sign other documents without Biden’s direct involvement.
The committee has not announced when it will release transcripts of Jean-Pierre’s testimony or when further witnesses will be called.
The investigation into both Biden’s cognitive state and the autopen controversy remains ongoing.
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of RVM News. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.