Joe Biden addressed criticism surrounding his administration’s use of an autopen during a recent interview with The New York Times, defending the practice that has drawn scrutiny from Republican lawmakers and the current administration.
The interview, published Thursday, focused on Biden’s use of the autopen to authorize clemency for more than 1,500 individuals during the final weeks of his presidency.
At the time, the White House described the action as the largest single-day act of clemency by a U.S. president.
BREAKING: Biden’s pardons of the January 6th committee were signed by autopen at the direction of an assistant pic.twitter.com/KQBylTlz0m
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) July 14, 2025
Speaking to The Times, Biden said he personally made the decisions behind the clemency effort. “We’re talking about [granting clemency to] a whole lot of people,” Biden said.
Here's What They're Not Telling You About Your Retirement
Despite the former president’s assertion, The Times reported that Biden “did not individually approve each name for the categorical pardons that applied to large numbers of people,” according to both Biden and his aides.
Biden’s White House staff and lawyers are in deep trouble for their autopen nonsense. That’s the only conclusion you can come to after reading between the lines of this ridiculous New York Times attempt to defend the unprecedented use of the autopen. A few nuggets: There is no… pic.twitter.com/lzaV2opTyK
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) July 14, 2025
Instead, the report said, he “signed off on the standards he wanted to be used to determine which convicts would qualify for a reduction in sentence” after discussions about possible criteria.
New York Times: “Biden didn’t individually approve each name for the categorical pardons list… his staff ran the final version through the autopen” pic.twitter.com/jbETqJ8slL
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) July 14, 2025
Once those criteria were approved, White House aides implemented them, and the autopen was used to affix Biden’s signature to the final documents.
According to the report, the decision to use the autopen was made to avoid having the president repeatedly sign updated versions of official paperwork.
FREE Gun Law Map: Laws Don't Pause During Social Unrest
The use of the device — which mechanically reproduces a person’s signature — has become a political flashpoint in recent months, with President Donald Trump and Republican leaders raising questions about how often it was used and whether it was appropriate.
In June, President Trump directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to open a Department of Justice investigation into the use of the autopen during Biden’s presidency.
In a memo sent to the DOJ, Trump questioned whether the use of the device was connected to concerns about Biden’s mental acuity.
MORE NEWS: CA Voter Fraud Probe Uncovers Evidence, State Politicians Scramble to Deny Reality [WATCH]
“In recent months, it has become increasingly apparent that former President Biden's aides abused the power of Presidential signatures through the use of an autopen to conceal Biden's cognitive decline and assert Article II authority,” Trump wrote.
“This conspiracy marks one of the most dangerous and concerning scandals in American history. The American public was purposefully shielded from discovering who wielded the executive power, all while Biden's signature was deployed across thousands of documents to effect radical policy shifts.”
Also in June, President Trump addressed the issue with reporters, saying he found the use of the autopen “inappropriate,” even though previous administrations have used it in limited instances.
“Usually, when they put documents in front of you, they’re important,” Trump said.
“Even if you’re signing ambassadorships or — and I consider that important — I think it’s inappropriate.”
“You have somebody that’s devoting four years of their life or more to being an ambassador. I think that person deserves to get a real signature… not an autopen signature.”
The Department of Justice has not yet released a timeline for its review, but the probe is expected to examine internal White House processes and determine who had authority to deploy the autopen on Biden’s behalf.
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.
It is obvious to any American , that biden, didn’t know WHAT was going on,or WHAT was being signed by the “autopen”, and now he is attempting to LIE his way out of it. (typical democommunist)
The scandal scam forced on Americans 2020 will stay with the country in it’s history.Biden was/is the scandal and the election was a scam
At this point in Joe’s life, it would be best to leave him in his basement!!!!!!
The only autopen usage that would satisfy me is to have a physical piece of paper with Joe Spud’s handwritten signature (or at least initials) saying something such as, “I authorize the use of the autopen to sign pardons for the following people:” with a list of names.
For individual items such as EOs or appointments, there’s no excuse for failing to sign the actual document unless Spud was away from his White Hut and wanted something to take immediate effect. But even in that case, there needs to be a follow-up authorization actually signed or initialed.
Anything else is invalid, null, void, ineffective, bogus, phony, illegal, and fraudulent.
Of course the demented, little girl fondling old pedo would say that he authorized the use of the autopen now that it has been discovered how the autopen was illegally used. DemocRATs can not help but lie, it is their DNA (Dems Never Accurate).