Dr. Phil joined New York City Mayor Eric Adams on a subway tour aimed at addressing the city’s growing safety concerns and homelessness crisis. The visit, which came on the heels of Marine veteran Daniel Penny’s acquittal, highlighted the tense realities of life in the city’s underground transit system.
“This subway system is the lifeblood of our economy because it’s the great equalizer,” Adams explained, emphasizing the importance of safety for all riders. “You could have the Wall Streeter and the waiter riding side-by-side. People not only need to be safe, but they must feel safe. The police uniform sends a signal.”
As the New York Post reported, the tour soon turned into a teachable moment when the duo encountered a homeless man sprawled out in a subway hallway. A sergeant accompanying the group described the protocol for approaching such individuals, explaining that the process begins with a Department of Homeless Services (DHS) worker.
Trump's Sovereign Wealth Fund: What Could It Mean For Your Money?
Adams quickly pointed out the need for police involvement in such situations. “If this person wakes up and is schizophrenic or bipolar, he could have a weapon. You can’t just send in civilians,” he said.
True to his warning, the scene escalated rapidly. The homeless man awoke and began shouting profanities at the DHS worker before confronting nearby officers aggressively. Dr. Phil and Adams observed as the man’s demeanor shifted from passive to hostile in seconds.
“See how fast it can turn?” Adams said, gesturing toward the volatile interaction. “Now you have just civilians here, they can be hurt.”
The incident served as a stark reminder of the complexities surrounding homelessness and public safety. Adams argued that many critics of his administration’s approach fail to understand how quickly these situations can spiral out of control.
This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year
“I believe, that’s what the people who are pushing back on what we’re doing-they don’t know how quick this could change,” he remarked, drawing on his decades of experience in law enforcement.
During the encounter, the homeless man shouted about being an American citizen and not receiving adequate care. Adams acknowledged the man’s frustration.
“Think about this for a moment. Doing what we’re doing is costly. If we had $6.5 billion we could do more, but instead of that we had to deal with a national problem.”
The mayor was referencing New York City’s migrant crisis, which has seen the city handle 220,000 migrants in recent years. Adams clarified that the state’s constitution mandates a “right to shelter” for all individuals, regardless of immigration status—a provision that complicates matters further.
“The right to shelter was never conceived with the migrant crisis in mind,” added Deputy Mayor for Health and Human Services Brian Stettin.
Dr. Phil’s visit shed light on the daunting challenges faced by New York City’s leaders as they navigate the intersection of homelessness, public safety, and federal immigration policy.
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of RVM News. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.
Glad to see Adams getting on board with common sense, however, he’s a liar and a cheat. The Democrats, his people, caused this problem. Before Jimmy Carter, homeless people could be arrested and reviewed for mental illness and put in an asylum for care and treatment. The Democrats claimed this was a human rights violation and an infringement on the mentally ill’s rights and freedom. They actually took the position that the mentally ill had the right to not take their meds and live on the streets to endanger themselves and the public. The asylums were closed and the patients were turned out onto the street by the Democrats. For Adams to not include that in his call for overturning those decisions is dishonest in the extreme. It should also be noted that this decision was made for political gain to create problems for the incoming Reagan administration not for any sort of care for the mentally ill.