Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) raised eyebrows on Wednesday when she offered an unusual explanation for why fewer women pursue careers in manufacturing.
During a House Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade subcommittee hearing titled “AI in Manufacturing: Securing American Leadership in Manufacturing and the Next Generation of Technologies,” Schakowsky suggested that the word “manufacturing” itself may discourage women from entering the field.
Schakowsky recounted a recent meeting with a manufacturing company that works to increase young people’s participation in the industry.
Trump's Sovereign Wealth Fund: What Could It Mean For Your Money?
She inquired about the number of female students showing interest in manufacturing careers and was told that the figure was around 13%.
“You had mentioned trying to engage more women in manufacturing,” Schakowsky said during the hearing. “I’m just wondering if just the name ‘manufacturing’ sounds like a guy.”
Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D) suggests that the reason more women don’t go into manufacturing is because “the name manufacturing sounds like a guy.”pic.twitter.com/l0dndiAmIY
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) February 13, 2025
This Could Be the Most Important Video Gun Owners Watch All Year
Her remarks quickly gained attention online, with many users questioning whether the terminology of the field has any actual impact on career decisions.
The statement was widely shared across social media platforms, prompting both criticism and amusement from commentators who found the assertion unusual.
ARE YOU READY FOR THIS ONE … AND I DIDN’T MAKE THIS UP!@janschakowsky, one of the Congressional Representative for Illinois, today during a hearing complained that the word “manufacturing” was (get this) ‘too masculine and no woman would want to work in it’.
I’m just… pic.twitter.com/3UiIAFaCLV
— C-Reason🇺🇸 (@CreasonJana) February 13, 2025
Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) said that there might be less women in manufacturing because the name “sounds like a guy.” If a Democratic leader proposes to use the word “womanufacturing,” we’ll lose every election for the rest of my life.
— Cenk Uygur (@cenkuygur) February 13, 2025
While workforce participation in manufacturing has traditionally skewed male, many industry leaders cite factors such as education, career interest, and job training as primary influences—rather than the wording of the job title itself.
The manufacturing sector has long been working to increase female participation, with organizations implementing initiatives to attract and train women for careers in the industry.
According to the National Association of Manufacturers, women currently make up about 29% of the manufacturing workforce, though efforts are ongoing to increase that number through targeted outreach programs.
Schakowsky’s comments add to ongoing discussions about gender representation in STEM and technical fields, but whether the terminology itself is a deterrent remains up for debate.
Connect with Vetted Off-Duty Cops to Instantly Fulfill Your Security Needs
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.
Must be an ultraliberal college graduate, looking for any reason, no matter how insane, to garner social media “likes”.
See just manufactured some B/S.
Perhaps she should look at the spelling of woMAN.
And the Dems worry they are losing ground! Here we have a prime example why.
This SUBVERSION is a MARXIST style subversion, that Jews always use, throughout time. Typical how they work to subvert whatever country they seek to parasitize, the past 500+ years. In the History books that they have not been able to destroy, yet.