In a recent interview with NBC’s Kristen Welker, Senator JD Vance (R-OH) stood firmly behind former President Donald Trump’s controversial remarks suggesting that America’s greatest threats come from within its own borders.
Trump’s comments, made during an interview with Joe Rogan, have stirred widespread debate after he stated, “We have a bigger problem, in my opinion, with the enemy from within,” emphasizing domestic issues over foreign adversaries like North Korea.
A very, very important segment.
Trump talks North Korea, how Obama wasn’t respected, the “enemy from within” and the southern border.
Donald Trump has absolutely won the Presidency with this podcast with Joe Rogan.
This is historic. pic.twitter.com/IHrTG6rYc2
— Steve 🇺🇸 (@SteveLovesAmmo) October 26, 2024
Celebrate Trump's Historic 2024 Victory with the Exclusive Trump 47th President Collection!
Welker questioned Vance on this perspective, bringing up recent cybersecurity threats from China and concerns about Russia’s geopolitical influence.
Vance, however, redirected the focus toward what he described as failed domestic leadership, particularly under prominent figures in the Democratic Party.
He asserted that the internal issues facing the country—such as economic challenges, a struggling industrial base, and immigration concerns—pose a more immediate threat to the United States than foreign adversaries.
In the exchange, Welker asked if Vance truly believes domestic leaders are more dangerous than international rivals. “What he said—and I do agree with this—is that the biggest threat we have in our country isn’t a foreign adversary, because we can handle these guys. We can handle foreign conflicts,” Vance responded.
He then pointed to figures like former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, arguing that under her leadership, the U.S. fell behind China in industrial power and manufacturing.
“The fact that our industrial base has shifted overseas, largely to China, falls on the shoulders of our own leadership. Our own leadership is failing to lead this country into peace and prosperity,” Vance stated.
Vance then turned his focus to Kamala Harris and other current leaders, highlighting issues he believes are more pressing than foreign threats. “When I consider the biggest threats to America, I think the fact that people can’t afford groceries, the fact that we can’t meet our recruitment goals in the military, the fact that Americans have a wide-open southern border—that’s a far bigger threat than any foreign threat. Yes, it’s caused by broken leadership,” he added.
NEW: JD Vance dismantles the “enemy from within” hoax in one minute after NBC’s Kristen Welker tried cornering him on the topic.
Welker: Does Pelosi & Schiff pose a larger threat to the United States than Russia & China?
Vance: Under Nancy Pelosi’s long life in public… pic.twitter.com/oc5dKj4w5A
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) October 27, 2024
In recent years, the Biden-Harris administration has emphasized the threat of domestic terrorism, with a focus on white supremacy.
MORE NEWS: J6 Committee And Russian Collusion Hoaxers Are Scared About Trump’s Harmeet Pick | Sean Parnell
Last year, Joe Biden stated that “domestic terrorism rooted in white supremacy is the greatest terrorist threat we face in the homeland,” a stance echoed by Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, who labeled domestic threats as the most significant risk to the nation.
JUST IN: The same intelligence community that determined the Hunter Biden laptop story was ‘Russian disinformation’ has determined that ‘white supremacy’ is the greatest terrorist threat Americans face.
The greatest threat Americans face is the US intelligence community.
“The… pic.twitter.com/ogzQzVdFQp
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) August 28, 2023
These statements have faced little pushback from mainstream media.
However, critics argue that while the Biden-Harris administration focuses on domestic terrorism, other pressing issues—such as economic struggles and border security—have gone unaddressed.
Vance highlighted the perceived inconsistency, noting that media scrutiny was quick to follow Trump’s remarks about domestic threats but largely absent when similar rhetoric came from the Biden-Harris administration.
MORE NEWS: Adam Schiff’s Own Words Come Back To Haunt Him As He Shrugs Off J6 Accountability [WATCH]
As Election Day approaches, the debate over what truly constitutes the most significant threat to America continues to be a focal point in the campaign, with both sides presenting vastly different perspectives on the challenges facing the nation.
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.
The press need refection. The make the Nazis look like amateurs.
Harvard professors … advised pushing a “militant democracy” to ensure an “authoritarian figure” like former President … [to] restrict or outlaw speech against “antidemocratic forces.
JD Vance. in interview, said disappointed war-mongering cabinet members became never-Trumpers.
*******************************************************
THE ULTIMATE HYPOCRISY
***
The ultimate hypocrisy: The U.S. government that claims they can use the Standing Military with lethal force to suppress dissident demonstrations to protect the continuity of the — lawful – government.
***
The Oath of Office to which each bureaucrat has sworn to support, and authorizes their jurisdiction, contains the provision that the existing government does not have the power of a Standing Military. The lawful military power is vested in the militia of each independent State and must be activated by Congress to become a national body for two years. After activation by Congress, the Officers, as Commanders of the authorized military, are to be appointed by the States. [These provisions have been abrogated since 1947.] Ref: Art I, Sec 8, clauses 12-16.
***
The Standing Army has been continuously used since 1947 to initiate war-mongering for the economic benefit of the MIC and financial entities using the IMF and NATO. Economic benefits, and U.S. supplies and troops, for Ukraine and Israel are for the same purpose. Those actions now threaten nuclear WW III.
***
The authority operating in D.C. does not have Constitutional authority to order or authorize a Standing Military to any action.
***
Is a military officer, who has not been lawfully appointed, illegally impersonating a government official ?