Hunter Biden is the primary subject of the Marco Polo forensic report on the Biden laptop, which is a verified tranche of primary and secondary source evidence for a wide slate of crimes committed by the Biden Crime Family, including President Joe Biden. Hunter Biden was charged on 07 Dec 23 by Special Counsel David Weiss in a 56-page indictment. The indictment charges Hunter Biden with nine tax-related crimes in a contrived effort that comes out of a compromised Department of Justice overseen by a compromised Attorney General in Merrick Garland, who happens to work for the defendant’s father, who happens to be President of the United States. There’s nothing to see here, though…again…except the rule of law ending where the real story begins, and it begins with what is not contained in the indictment.
The Cookie-Cutter Clean-Up and Cover-Up Operation
Make no mistake about Hunter Biden’s indictment on nine tax-related charges or its veiled ulterior purpose because the indictment is another rubber-stamped, cookie-cutter, template clean-up and cover-up operation of “unavoidable circumstances” coming out of the Intelligence Community and effectuated by the Department of Justice.
ZStack – Make Your Immune System Clean, Resilient, and Resistant (Use code RVM for discount)
The topic of “unavoidable circumstances” is routinely examined because those circumstances shape the topography of the landscape and trend towards predictive positioning and making projections that are laser-accurate.
Marco Polo’s forensic dossier on the Biden laptop is the gold standard exemplar for the Bidens’ “unavoidable circumstances.”
Marco Polo’s technically pristine and exhaustive forensic dossier is irrefutable and undeniable due to its impeccable sourcing and citation.
Moreover, the dossier has an evidenced and verifiable chain of custody that puts Hunter Biden as the last link on one end and Marco Polo as the previous link on the other end.
Stop Risking Your Safety: Uncover the Truth Behind the Best Survival Caliber!
The Bidens can’t avoid that.
Everything inside the dossier is reliably reproducible and truthful, which is why Marco Polo and its founder, former White House advisor under Peter Navarro, Garrett Ziegler, have only been attacked by the Bidens with lawfare suits alleging everything except defamation.
In other words, no one has challenged Marco Polo on the contents of the dossier rather, the attacks have angled in on the individuals and fraudulent allegations of manipulating data, etc., exactly as I projected it would at the very beginning of these matters.
These clean-up and cover-up operations derive from the Intelligence Community and play-out through its proxy, the Department of Justice.
The IC operations are routinely designed such that jurisdiction and authority envelop the scope of the subject’s criminality, and in this case, it’s the Bidens’ and, more specifically, Hunter Biden’s criminality, so that DOJ can control the fall-out of “unavoidable circumstances” to steer matters to the most tactically effective landing spot that is available.
DOJ is forced to mitigate its own exposure because Marco Polo’s dossier is the evidence upon which a mountain of reliable reporting from a growing number of trusted sources on the Bidens’ criminality resides.
The more people seeing the mountain, the more unavoidable things become, and so DOJ had to do something.
In a sense, the dossier ensured that Hunter Biden would face some degree of prosecution because he would not be able to evade his crimes with Marco Polo’s forensic dossier existing in a the full public spectrum and with activism in its backdrop to further its widespread dissemination and access.
This makes some form of a Biden indictment necessary where the DOJ can function, as I have outlined.
This means we expect to see the full scope of the Bidens’ criminality enveloped by the DOJ’s jurisdiction so as to vacuum up that evidence and compartmentalize it within the prosecution of lesser crimes and misdemeanors that will amount to a slap on the wrist.
Sound familiar?
It should be because it’s a very old play on a tattered page in an ancient playbook that is well-understood.
“See, Joe is a good dad and president. He even let Merrick prosecute Hunter out of transparency and the rule of law. No one is above the law, including the President and his son,” is what they’ll say.
Good luck finding horse shit deeper than that.
Hunter and Joe will play the victim card just like race-baiting Democrats always do.
In fact, Hunter is already doing it, and moreover, he was doing it prior to the announcement of the indictment, which is a clear indicator that the DOJ gave advance notice to the Bidens so Hunter could get in front of it to establish the “victim card” narrative pretext:
The retort to Hunter was an obvious one:
As clean-up and cover-up operations continue to unpack with lawfare as the primary tool of the trade, yesterday, on 11 Dec 23, ABC News reported that Hunter Biden’s attorneys filed to have his gun crimes in Delaware dismissed.
The timing of the constructed “victim card” pretext narrative established by Hunter Biden bears down on his gun charges where it’s obvious that DOJ and the Bidens work in orchestration [emphasis added]:
In a flurry of court papers filed Monday, Abbe Lowell, an attorney for Hunter Biden, offered a series of arguments for dismissing the gun case, claiming that the special counsel was “unlawfully appointed” and therefore lacks the authority to bring charges; that the immunity stipulation in a section of the parties’ ill-fated plea deal remains in effect; and that the gun crimes in question may not be constitutional.
“These charges are unprecedented, unconstitutional and violate the agreement the U.S. Attorney made with Mr. Biden and DOJ’s own regulations,” Lowell said in a statement. “This is not how an independent investigation is supposed to work, and these charges should be dismissed.”
Lowell signaled last week his intention to file a motion to dismiss the gun charges, shortly after special counsel David Weiss brought nine additional tax-related charges against Hunter Biden in California.
Weiss’ office filed the gun-related charges in September, shortly after Attorney General Merrick Garland elevated him to special counsel.
ABC News
Again, in lawfare and as exemplified above, the attorneys purposefully argue everything except the merits of the case, seeking a safety line or exit portal anywhere they can.
Further evidence is found in the layered, orchestrated, and constructed tactics where it was none other than Special Counsel David Weiss who initially filed the gun charges last September in response to “unavoidable circumstances.”
Weiss’ jurisdiction and oversight over both the gun charges and the tax-related charges make him a critical and obvious component to examine.
When Weiss was first appointed Special Counsel, I said this in my article TRUMP INDICTMENT: Timing of Latest DJT Indictment Again Follows Biden DOJ Cover-up Maneuver as Communist America Reaches Full Banana Republic Status from 17 Aug 23, days after Garland’s announcement.
According to Occam’s, there is only one reason for this: The Special Counsel appointment is the most effective and guaranteed mechanism for Biden’s DOJ to protect Hunter from severe exposure to criminal prosecution, and in so doing, it protects Joe Biden from the same exposure.
On 14 Aug 23 and three days after Weiss’ appointment as Special Counsel, Willis returned the RICO indictment against Trump and 18 others.“
his is yet another example of predictive positioning and making projections that are laser-accurate and long in advance.
Weiss’ examination begins with what he left-out of the tax-related charges.
One last thought here about a critical element: timing.
If you’ve been following my year-long work into the Intelligence Community’s operations to remove Biden for 2024, which got to full speed with The Biden Penn Center revelations, the Biden impeachment narrative is drawn into the center.
Therefore, we must consider the timing of Hunter Biden’s indictment relative to the timing of any Joe Biden impeachment, and when we do, the aggregate fact set bears out with the hallmarks of IC clean-up and cover-up operations.
It’ll look like a Hunter Biden prosecution with fidelity to the rule of law, and the MSM and politburo will guarantee this, but in reality, we’ll see a template clean-up and cover-up operation posing as a prosecution as has become so customary with Garland’s brand of two-tiered justice that equates to unvarnished Marxist communism.
As America watches Hunter get publicly spanked for having his hand in the cookie jar, what the people will not see is exactly what they should see: the DOJ exposing and prosecuting the Biden Crime Family for selling us all out to China and getting rich along the way; including Ukraine and other nations.
Read my exclusive piece from June 2021 that establishes how the Bidens used energy as the global currency for corruption, criminality, and treason: FOLLOW THE MONEY.
What Is Not In The Hunter Biden Indictment
Now is not the time or place to recapitulate the full scope of crimes committed by the Biden Crime Family, which is necessary contextual backdrop to the indictment’s omissions, and so readers should pursue that independently as needed.
Jeff Carlson addresses the indictment’s omissions succinctly and in ways to comport with longstanding and deep Moonshine analysis [emphasis added]:
The Hunter indictment effectively goes back to what Weiss SHOULD have filed in the first place, MINUS all the Burisma issues that expired under SOL – from delays that Weiss appeared to engineer.
All tax focused. BUT no FARA. No money laundering. Fails to address larger Biden family schemes.
Hunter no longer testifying behind closed doors (I assume) – which also likely means Eric Schwerin is out.
It seems like the indictment is effectively designed around Hunter’s addict behavior. “It’s bad. But Hunter was an addict.”
This verifies a lot of Hunter’s immoral activities but not all that much on Joe. Maybe enough to help push Joe out for 2024, but that’s in the works anyway.
At the heart of things, there’s been an ongoing and repeated pattern of Hunter following his father into various countries where Joe Biden was conducting foreign policy business. China, Ukraine, Russia, Kazakhstan and Romania. Even Mexico.
All countries typified by corruption that Hunter could exploit by using his father’s name. Which he did repeatedly. In every country mentioned above.
That pattern and impact are not truly exposed or laid out in this filing. And that’s exactly what should have been the primary focus.
I would have strongly preferred to have Hunter testify in a closed hearing – followed by testimony from Schwerin – who holds the keys to everything.
The timing of indictment seems highly suspect as it stops both those things from happening.
At best, this indictment is what should have been issued by Weiss, to begin with before the crucial Statute of Limitations expired.
Weiss/ prosecutors must answer why these charges could be filed now but not before as they should have been. And again, no FARA or money laundering. Practically speaking, it’s another big and effective delay from Weiss.
And one that magically hits just as Hunter set to be deposed behind closed doors.
Watch to see if Eric Schwerin cancels.
Jeff Carlson
Carlson reminds us of a critical fact attributable to the architect of the Hunter Biden clean-up and cover-up operation where Weiss permitted the statute of limitations [SOL] to expire for the Biden Crime Family’s Burisma crimes in Ukraine.
In other words, Weiss kicked the can of Biden/Burisma/Ukraine crimes so far down the road that the road ended, and the can was thrown into the trash.
Carlson also appears to be drunk on Moonshine because we see most of it the same with only slight variation: 1-the timing is highly suspicious, 2-clean-up and cover-up operations are underway, 3-the “victim card” is being leveraged, 4-[the IC] is already in the process of removing Biden, 5-the Bidens’ criminality centers on constructs of enterprise fraud using energy as the global currency [read Follow the Money], 6-the veiling aspect of open testimony v. closed-door testimony and 7-the FARA and money laundering [see the Keystone of Corruption series] components.
Returning to timing and as Carlson tells us, note how the DOJ is able to intrude on Congressional hearings because the scope of the indictment envelops the subject matter of the hearings.
Again, these transactions are dripping with orchestration, collusion, and conspiracy between the DOJ and the Biden Crime Family.
Moreover, the same DOJ that is cleaning up and covering-up for Joe Biden is the same DOJ that is targeting and prosecuting Biden’s political opposition and enemies.
That’s having your cake and eating it, too.
More accurately, that’s Marxist communism.
What Is In The Hunter Biden Indictment
Reporting from NBC News indicates that [emphasis added],
The 56-page filing laid out a series of charges, including allegations that the president’s son failed to pay taxes, failed to file, evaded an assessment, and filed a fraudulent form. The indictment says that “rather than pay his taxes, the Defendant spent millions of dollars on an extravagant lifestyle.”
“Between 2016 and October 15, 2020, the Defendant spent this money on drugs, escorts and girlfriends, luxury hotels and rental properties, exotic cars, clothing, and other items of a personal nature, in short, everything but his taxes,” the indictment says.
The charges, which include six misdemeanor tax offenses, were brought by special counsel David Weiss, a Trump appointee who previously served as U.S. attorney in Delaware and has been overseeing the federal investigation into Hunter Biden.
The maximum penalty the president’s son could face if convicted is 17 years in prison, according to Weiss’ office.
“According to the indictment, Hunter Biden engaged in a four-year scheme in which he chose not to pay at least $1.4 million in self-assessed federal taxes he owed for tax years 2016 through 2019 and to evade the assessment of taxes for the tax year 2018 when he filed false returns,” Weiss’ office said in a news release.
NBC News
NBC’s reporting on the six misdemeanors and three felonies comports with Huter Biden’s established pretext narrative “woe is me” as he plays the “victim card”: “Hunter Biden attorney Abbe Lowell said in a statement that if the president’s son’s “last name was anything other than Biden, the charges in Delaware, and now California, would not have been brought.”
Woe is me, indeed.
Victim card played.
BC News obtained the letter from Lowell to Weiss’ office dated Tuesday, in which he requested a meeting “that occurs in almost every white-collar investigation” to discuss the investigation.
“We would like to avail ourselves of the ability to engage with you and such offices,” Lowell wrote in the letter, which cited a Justice Department policy to “engage counsel in situations such as those that might be reviewed for other possible offenses.”
[…]
The indictment, which does not appear to refer to President Biden or his previous role as vice president, argues that Hunter Biden had the opportunity to pay his taxes at various points, taking into account the money he received for expenses from an entertainment lawyer who was a personal friend. The indictment also asserts that Biden misled his accountants into filing returns that included items marked as business expenses when he allegedly was not doing business at that time.
The indictment further points to certain payments that it says were incorrectly listed as expenses, including wired money that was written down as being for a “golf member deposit” when, according to prosecutors, it was used to “purchase a membership in a sex club.”
NBC News
*Emphasis added
The collision between one of Biden’s DOJ and the other Biden’s attorneys is palpable, almost tangible, and of course, none of it has anything to do with President Biden’s thoroughly evidenced criminality because any such indictment must include FARA and money laundering crimes.
Forbes outlines the full scope of the charges:
The charges allege Biden “engaged in a four-year scheme to not pay at least $1.4 million in self-assessed federal taxes” that he owed for tax years between 2016 and 2019, as well as evaded assessment of his taxes for 2018 by filing false returns in February 2020.
The indictment also alleges that Biden “subverted the payroll and tax withholding process” of a business entity he owns called Owasco by withdrawing millions from it and “spent millions of dollars on an extravagant lifestyle,” including $397,530 on clothing and accessories and $683,212 in payments to “various women” between 2016 and 2019, instead of paying his tax bills.
Biden allegedly stopped paying outstanding and overdue taxes for tax year 2015 in 2018 and “willfully failed to pay” his taxes on time for 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019 “despite having access to funds to pay some or all of” his taxes.
He also allegedly “willfully failed” to file his tax returns for 2017 and 2018 on time, and when he did file his 2018 return, allegedly included false business deductions—such as $3,852 to rent a Lamborghini, stays at multiple luxury hotels, $3,947 to a Washington, D.C. strip club, and $27,316 in payments to an online porn site—” in order to evade assessment of taxes to reduce the substantial tax liabilities he faced” since February 2020.
According to the filing, Biden “made millions” in income between 2016 and 2020, including from his board of directors position for Ukrainian industrial conglomerate Burisma Holdings Limited, through an associate’s business deal with Chinese energy conglomerate CEFC China Energy Co Ltd. and some from his non-fiction memoir “Beautiful Things.”
The full indictment can be read here linked by ABC News.
Red Voice Media features Marco Polo founder Garrett Ziegler discussing the Hunter Biden indictment with Steve Bannon:
Final Thoughts
First, they cleaned up and covered-up matters involving Kevin Clinesmith, Michael Sussmann, and Special Counsel John Durham.
Now, they’re cleaning up and covering-up matters involving Joe and Hunter Biden and architect Special Counsel David Weiss.
And they are doing it for all of the shared reasons outlined here and in the full corpus of analysis.
For a very long time, this is how it has worked.
For Biden’s DOJ, it continues to work that way and in the most egregious forms in recorded history.
Hunter Biden’s indictment for nine tax-related charges is a component of the Intelligence Community operation being effectuated by the DOJ to clean up and cover-up significant amounts of criminality by Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, and the Biden Crime Family, and that is the only plausible explanation.
-End-
CIA’s Operation Mockingbird Historical Deep Dive & The Rise Of Alternative Media
Emergency Preparedness Kits - My Patriot Supply
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Red Voice Media. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary.
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.